The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi government authorities to decide the Delhi Prosecutors Welfare Association’s objections to the mandatory biometric attendance system within four weeks.
The petition was disposed of by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, who directed that the writ petition itself be treated as a representation to the concerned authorities.
Background of the Case
The Delhi Prosecutors Welfare Association had challenged circulars requiring Public Prosecutors to register and mark attendance through the Aadhaar Enabled Biometric Attendance System (AEBAS).
According to the petition, biometric attendance was introduced for government departments, including the Directorate of Prosecution, from April 8, 2026. Until the system was installed, prosecutors were required to mark physical attendance from April 27.
The Association objected, stating that Public Prosecutors work across different courts and may also need to visit police stations and other locations as part of their official duties.
“Public Prosecutors, being officers of the Court, are required to attend different courts and, in the course of their duties, visit police stations and other locations.”
The Association argued that its representations had not been considered before the authorities proceeded with implementation of the attendance system.
Court’s Decision
After hearing both sides, the High Court directed that the petition be treated as a representation of the Association.
The respondents must decide the representation within four weeks and give the petitioner a personal hearing. The decision must also be communicated to the Association.
The Court disposed of the petition and left the Association free to approach the High Court again through a fresh writ petition if any further grievance remains.
Case Details
Case Title: Delhi Prosecutors Welfare Association vs State GNCT of Delhi and Anr.
Case Number: W.P.(C) 11846/2026
Judge: Hon'ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma
Decision Date: August 17, 2026
