Advertisement
Trending Stories
Latest news
See More
Supreme Court Rules Insurer Not Liable for Penalty Under Employees’ Compensation Act in Driver’s Death Case
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has clarified that an insurance company cannot be made liable to pay a statutory penalty imposed on an employer for delay in compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923.
Read also:- Patna High Court Dismisses Plea for Compensation Over Alleged Illegal Detention, Flags Lapses
Advertisement
Supreme Court Updates
See More
Supreme Court Rules Insurer Not Liable for Penalty Under Employees’ Compensation Act in Driver’s Death Case
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has clarified that an insurance company cannot be made liable to pay a statutory penalty imposed on an employer for delay in compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923.
Read also:- Patna High Court Dismisses Plea for Compensation Over Alleged Illegal Detention, Flags Lapses
Advertisement
High courts Updates
See More
Rajasthan High Court Grants Divorce to Woman, Says Husband’s Repeated Non-Appearance and Non-Payment Is Mental Cruelty
The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur has dissolved a marriage after finding that the husband’s consistent refusal to appear in court and failure to pay maintenance amounted to mental cruelty.
Read also:- Patna High Court Dismisses Plea for Compensation Over Alleged Illegal Detention, Flags Lapses
Advertisement
Latest Judgment
See More
Supreme Court Rules Insurer Not Liable for Penalty Under Employees’ Compensation Act in Driver’s Death Case
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has clarified that an insurance company cannot be made liable to pay a statutory penalty imposed on an employer for delay in compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923.
Read also:- Patna High Court Dismisses Plea for Compensation Over Alleged Illegal Detention, Flags Lapses
Consumer Cases
See more
J&K High Court upholds flood compensation for Srinagar family, dismisses insurer’s appeal over undisclosed exclusion clause in house damage claim
At the Srinagar wing of the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court, a bench comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Sanjay Parihar on Thursday dismissed an appeal filed by National Insurance Company Limited. The insurer was seeking to overturn a compensation award granted to a family whose home was damaged during the devastating 2014 floods.
The case originates from a policy taken by late Shad Mohd Bashir, whose residential house at Sarai Payeen, Amira Kadal, Srinagar, had been insured since 2009. Though the policy was renewed annually, the company later claimed that it excluded flood and similar storm-related risks - referred to in technical jargon as “STFI” (Storm, Tempest, Flood, Inundation).







































