Logo

Advertisement

Latest news

See More
MP High Court Quashes FIR Against House Owner for Hosting Foreign Guest, Says Repealed Law Can’t Be Used
V
Vivek G.

MP High Court Quashes FIR Against House Owner for Hosting Foreign Guest, Says Repealed Law Can’t Be Used

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh has quashed a criminal case against a Umaria resident who was booked for allegedly failing to report the stay of a foreign national at his home. The court made it clear that authorities cannot prosecute citizens under a law that no longer exists.

Read also:- Humiliation Is Not Justice: Allahabad High Court Strikes Down Placard Punishment for Student

Latest News

Advertisement

Supreme Court Updates

See More

Advertisement

High courts Updates

See More
MP High Court Quashes FIR Against House Owner for Hosting Foreign Guest, Says Repealed Law Can’t Be Used
V
Vivek G.

MP High Court Quashes FIR Against House Owner for Hosting Foreign Guest, Says Repealed Law Can’t Be Used

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh has quashed a criminal case against a Umaria resident who was booked for allegedly failing to report the stay of a foreign national at his home. The court made it clear that authorities cannot prosecute citizens under a law that no longer exists.

Read also:- Humiliation Is Not Justice: Allahabad High Court Strikes Down Placard Punishment for Student

High Courts

Advertisement

Latest Judgment

See More
Supreme Court Cuts ₹2 Crore Haircut Compensation, Limits ITC’s Liability to ₹25 Lakh Deposited Amount
V
Vivek G.

Supreme Court Cuts ₹2 Crore Haircut Compensation, Limits ITC’s Liability to ₹25 Lakh Deposited Amount

What began as a visit to a luxury hotel salon ended up before the Supreme Court, raising uncomfortable questions about consumer compensation and proof of loss. On Thursday, the apex court sharply reduced a ₹2 crore compensation awarded to a woman over an allegedly faulty haircut at a five-star hotel, holding that damages cannot rest on assumptions alone.

Read also:- Humiliation Is Not Justice: Allahabad High Court Strikes Down Placard Punishment for Student

Judgments

Consumer Cases

See more
J&K High Court upholds flood compensation for Srinagar family, dismisses insurer’s appeal over undisclosed exclusion clause in house damage claim
S
Shivam Y.

J&K High Court upholds flood compensation for Srinagar family, dismisses insurer’s appeal over undisclosed exclusion clause in house damage claim

At the Srinagar wing of the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court, a bench comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Sanjay Parihar on Thursday dismissed an appeal filed by National Insurance Company Limited. The insurer was seeking to overturn a compensation award granted to a family whose home was damaged during the devastating 2014 floods.

The case originates from a policy taken by late Shad Mohd Bashir, whose residential house at Sarai Payeen, Amira Kadal, Srinagar, had been insured since 2009. Though the policy was renewed annually, the company later claimed that it excluded flood and similar storm-related risks - referred to in technical jargon as “STFI” (Storm, Tempest, Flood, Inundation).

Consumer Cases