Latest news
See More
Supreme Court Restores 1975 Revenue Decree, Sets Aside 31-Year-Delayed Appeal in Rajasthan Land Dispute
The Supreme Court of India has restored a 1975 revenue court decree that declared tenancy rights (“khatedari”) over agricultural land in favour of the appellant, setting aside orders that had reopened the case after a delay of 31 years. The Court held that such a prolonged delay, combined with the absence of proof of fraud, could not justify disturbing a long-settled judgment.
Read also:- Kerala High Court: Advocate Cannot Stall Execution Proceedings Over Fee Dispute, ₹50k Cost Imposed
Supreme Court Updates
See MoreSupreme Court Restores 1975 Revenue Decree, Sets Aside 31-Year-Delayed Appeal in Rajasthan Land Dispute
The Supreme Court of India has restored a 1975 revenue court decree that declared tenancy rights (“khatedari”) over agricultural land in favour of the appellant, setting aside orders that had reopened the case after a delay of 31 years. The Court held that such a prolonged delay, combined with the absence of proof of fraud, could not justify disturbing a long-settled judgment.
Read also:- Kerala High Court: Advocate Cannot Stall Execution Proceedings Over Fee Dispute, ₹50k Cost Imposed
High courts Updates
See More
Kerala High Court: Advocate Cannot Stall Execution Proceedings Over Fee Dispute, ₹50k Cost Imposed
The Kerala High Court has held that an advocate cannot stall or interfere with execution proceedings to recover professional fees from a former client. Dismissing a writ petition filed by two advocates, the Court emphasised that fee disputes must be pursued through proper legal remedies and not by obstructing the client’s case.
Latest Judgment
See MoreSupreme Court Restores 1975 Revenue Decree, Sets Aside 31-Year-Delayed Appeal in Rajasthan Land Dispute
The Supreme Court of India has restored a 1975 revenue court decree that declared tenancy rights (“khatedari”) over agricultural land in favour of the appellant, setting aside orders that had reopened the case after a delay of 31 years. The Court held that such a prolonged delay, combined with the absence of proof of fraud, could not justify disturbing a long-settled judgment.
Read also:- Kerala High Court: Advocate Cannot Stall Execution Proceedings Over Fee Dispute, ₹50k Cost Imposed
Consumer Cases
See more
Rajasthan High Court Stays Consumer Proceedings Against Actor Salman Khan Over Pan Masala Advertisement Row
The Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur has put on hold the consumer proceedings initiated against actor Salman Khan in a case alleging misleading advertisement linked to a pan masala product. The order came during a hearing on a writ petition filed by the actor challenging earlier consumer forum directions.
