Latest news
See More
Bail Conditions Cannot Extend Beyond Accused: Delhi HC Quashes Directions Monitoring Wife’s Life
In a significant order, the Delhi High Court set aside certain bail conditions that required surveillance of an accused person’s wife, calling them an unjustified invasion of privacy. The court, however, allowed interim bail for a limited period to enable the petitioner to attend to his wife’s surgery.
Read also:- JJ Act Violated: Allahabad HC Cancels Ossification Test, Releases Minor on Bail
Supreme Court Updates
See More
Supreme Court Sets Aside FEMA Penalty Orders, Revives Proceedings from Show Cause Stage
In a significant ruling on foreign exchange law, the Supreme Court has set aside penalty and confiscation orders passed against a company and its directors under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). The Court held that the adjudication process had been improperly influenced and must restart from the show cause notice stage.
Authorities alleged that the appellants had acquired shares in a Singapore-based company without prior approval from the Reserve Bank of India, thereby violating FEMA provisions. Based on these allegations, assets of the appellants were seized under Section 37A of FEMA.
High courts Updates
See More
Bail Conditions Cannot Extend Beyond Accused: Delhi HC Quashes Directions Monitoring Wife’s Life
In a significant order, the Delhi High Court set aside certain bail conditions that required surveillance of an accused person’s wife, calling them an unjustified invasion of privacy. The court, however, allowed interim bail for a limited period to enable the petitioner to attend to his wife’s surgery.
Read also:- JJ Act Violated: Allahabad HC Cancels Ossification Test, Releases Minor on Bail
Latest Judgment
See More
Orissa HC Quashes Son’s Appeal Under Senior Citizens Law, Restores Maintenance Order for 83-Year-Old Mother
In a significant ruling focused on the protection of elderly parents, the Orissa High Court has set aside an appellate order passed by the Collector, holding that a son had no legal right to challenge a maintenance order under the Senior Citizens Act. The Court restored relief granted to an 83-year-old widow who had approached authorities after being neglected by her sons.
Read also:- Supreme Court Sets Aside FEMA Penalty Orders, Revives Proceedings from Show Cause Stage
Consumer Cases
See more
J&K High Court upholds flood compensation for Srinagar family, dismisses insurer’s appeal over undisclosed exclusion clause in house damage claim
At the Srinagar wing of the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court, a bench comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Sanjay Parihar on Thursday dismissed an appeal filed by National Insurance Company Limited. The insurer was seeking to overturn a compensation award granted to a family whose home was damaged during the devastating 2014 floods.
The case originates from a policy taken by late Shad Mohd Bashir, whose residential house at Sarai Payeen, Amira Kadal, Srinagar, had been insured since 2009. Though the policy was renewed annually, the company later claimed that it excluded flood and similar storm-related risks - referred to in technical jargon as “STFI” (Storm, Tempest, Flood, Inundation).
