Logo

Latest news

See More
POCSO Bail Row Reaches Supreme Court: Plea Challenges Relief Granted to Religious Figure
S
Shivam Y.

POCSO Bail Row Reaches Supreme Court: Plea Challenges Relief Granted to Religious Figure

A fresh legal battle has reached the Supreme Court after an appeal challenged the Allahabad High Court’s decision granting anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in a case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

After the FIR, the accused approached the High Court seeking anticipatory bail, which was granted.

Latest News

Supreme Court Updates

See More

High courts Updates

See More
Pension Cut Without Proper Inquiry Invalid: Jharkhand HC Rejects State’s Appeal
S
Shivam Y.

Pension Cut Without Proper Inquiry Invalid: Jharkhand HC Rejects State’s Appeal

In a significant ruling on pension rights and due process, the Jharkhand High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by the State, affirming that a retired government employee’s pension cannot be reduced without proper departmental proceedings and proof of misconduct.

These allegations stemmed from inquiry reports suggesting financial and execution lapses in microlift irrigation schemes in Bokaro district. Singh was issued show-cause notices before and after retirement, following which the pension cut order was passed in September 2017.

High Courts

Latest Judgment

See More
Suspicion Alone Not Abetment: Uttarakhand HC Acquits Man in Wife’s Suicide Case
S
Shivam Y.

Suspicion Alone Not Abetment: Uttarakhand HC Acquits Man in Wife’s Suicide Case

In a significant ruling on the scope of abetment of suicide, the Uttarakhand High Court set aside the conviction of a man accused of driving his wife to suicide. The Court held that mere suspicion over a spouse’s character and general marital discord cannot automatically amount to abetment under criminal law.

Read also:- Wife Found With Paramour, Husband Loses Self-Control: Gujarat High Court Upholds Culpable Homicide Verdict

Judgments

Consumer Cases

See more
J&K High Court upholds flood compensation for Srinagar family, dismisses insurer’s appeal over undisclosed exclusion clause in house damage claim
S
Shivam Y.

J&K High Court upholds flood compensation for Srinagar family, dismisses insurer’s appeal over undisclosed exclusion clause in house damage claim

At the Srinagar wing of the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court, a bench comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Sanjay Parihar on Thursday dismissed an appeal filed by National Insurance Company Limited. The insurer was seeking to overturn a compensation award granted to a family whose home was damaged during the devastating 2014 floods.

The case originates from a policy taken by late Shad Mohd Bashir, whose residential house at Sarai Payeen, Amira Kadal, Srinagar, had been insured since 2009. Though the policy was renewed annually, the company later claimed that it excluded flood and similar storm-related risks - referred to in technical jargon as “STFI” (Storm, Tempest, Flood, Inundation).

Consumer Cases