Logo

MP High Court Grants Bail to Mukesh Vij and Anil Malviya in Dewas Firecracker Factory Blast Case That Killed 12 Workers

Shivam
Add Court Book as a preferred source on Google

The Madhya Pradesh High Court granted bail to Mukesh Vij and Anil Malviya in the Dewas factory blast case that killed 12 workers. - Mukesh Vij v. State of M.P. and Another

MP High Court Grants Bail to Mukesh Vij and Anil Malviya in Dewas Firecracker Factory Blast Case That Killed 12 Workers

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has granted bail to Mukesh Vij and Anil Malviya in connection with the Dewas firecracker factory explosion that claimed 12 lives and left 19 workers seriously injured. The Court observed that continued detention was not necessary after the investigation had been completed and the charge-sheet had been filed.

Background

The incident occurred on May 14, 2026, at an alleged illegal fireworks manufacturing unit in Village Tokkala, Dewas district. According to the prosecution, around 70–75 workers were engaged in filling fireworks with gunpowder and chemicals when a massive explosion took place.

The prosecution alleged that Mukesh Vij was involved in financing and supplying materials through his firms, while Anil Malviya was associated with the factory's operations. Both were arrested in May 2026. Their regular bail applications were rejected by the Special Court on September 9, 2026, following which they approached the High Court.

Justice Alok Awasthi noted the seriousness of the incident but emphasised that the question of individual criminal responsibility would have to be examined during the trial.

Court Book subscription: bare acts, legal drafts, court judgments and ad-free legal news, plans from ₹30/month

The Court observed:

"The allegations against the appellants primarily arise from their respective positions as owner/financer and manager/partner/owner of the factory and their alleged failure to ensure compliance with the prescribed safety requirements."

The Court further clarified that holding a particular position in an establishment does not automatically establish criminal liability.

"Mere designation as owner/financer or manager/partner/owner cannot, in every circumstance, automatically establish criminal culpability."

The Court also noted that the investigation was complete, relevant evidence had been secured, and further custodial interrogation was not required. It clarified that its observations would not affect the trial or determination of the allegations.

Allowing both appeals, the High Court set aside the Special Court's rejection orders and directed the release of Mukesh Vij and Anil Malviya on bail upon furnishing personal bonds of ₹10 lakh each with separate solvent sureties of the same amount.

The Court imposed conditions, including restrictions on foreign travel, witness intimidation and participation in activities involving explosives without proper authorisation.

It also directed both appellants to cooperate with the trial.

PDF
Download Order
Free access
Open PDF

Take CourtBook Everywhere

Access your account on the go with our mobile app.

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Join the Court Book WhatsApp channel for latest judgments, notifications, legal news and exam updates