(1) An officer authorised under sub-section (1) of section 45 shall have the powers
to seize any goods -
(i) which are found in a dealer's place of business, vehicle, vessel or any other
building or place; or
(ii) which, such officer has reason to believe to belong to the dealer and which
are found in any place of business, vehicle, vessel or any other building
or place, but are not accounted for by the dealer in his accounts, registers
or other documents maintained in the ordinary course of his business.
(iii) which are found in any place of business, vehicle, vessel or any other
building or place, and such goods are accompanied by any tax invoice or
sale invoice or any other document pertaining to value of goods, as the
case may be, containing value of goods undervalued to the extent more
than fifty percent of the value of goods prevalent at the relevant time in
the local market area where the said transaction had taken place, with
intention to evade payment of tax.
Provided that a list of all the goods seized under this sub-section shall be
prepared by such officer and be signed by the officer and not less than two
witnesses.
(2) Where any officer referred to in sub-section (1) has reason to believe that the
goods found in any vehicle, vessel, building or place are not traced to any
bonafide dealer or the documents issued by a bonafide dealer with respect to
the accompanying goods contains wrong particulars or that it is doubtful if such
goods are properly accounted for by any dealer in his accounts, registers or
other documents, maintained in the ordinary course of his business, he shall
have power to seize such goods and the remaining provisions of this section
shall mutatis mutandis apply in relation to such seizure.
(sub-section (2) was substituted w.e.f. 20-08-2010 vide notif. no 1101(2) dt. 20-
08-2010, U.P. Act No 19 of 2010)
(3) An officer seizing the goods under sub-section (1) shall take all the measures
necessary for their safe custody and forward the list, referred to in the proviso
to sub-section (1), along with other documents relating to the seizure to the
assessing authority concerned.
(4) The said assessing authority shall serve on the dealer or, as the case may be, the
person in charge of the goods at the time of seizure (hereinafter in this section
referred to as the person in charge) a notice in writing requiring him to show
cause, why a penalty should not be imposed.
(5) If such authority, after taking into consideration the explanation, if any, of the
dealer or, as the case may be, the person in charge and after giving him an
opportunity of being heard, is satisfied that the said goods were omitted from
being shown in the accounts, registers and other documents referred to in subsection
(1) or not traced to any bonafide dealer or not properly accounted for by
any dealer or documents issued by a bonifide dealer with respect to the
accompanying goods contained wrong particulars or the goods are undervalued
to the extent of more than fifty percent of the value of goods prevalent at the
relevant time in the local market area where the said transaction had taken
place, with intention to evade payment of tax, it shall pass an order imposing a
penalty, not exceeding forty percent of the value of such goods or tax payable under the Act on the value of
such goods, whichever is higher* as he deems fit.
(sub-section (5) was substituted w.e.f. 20-08-2010 vide notif. no 1101(2) dt. 20-
08-2010, U.P. Act No 19 of 2010)
*Substituted by THE UTTAR PRADESH VALUE ADDED TAX (AMENDMENT) (SECOND) ORDINANCE, 2014
( U. P. ORDINANCE NO. 6 OF 2014 )
(6) A copy of the order imposing penalty under sub-section (5) shall be served on
the dealer or, as the case may be, the person in charge.
(7) The officer seizing the goods shall serve on the dealer or, as the case may be,
the person in charge an order in writing mentioning the fact of such seizure and
indicating the amount, not exceeding such amount as would be sufficient to
cover the penalty likely to be imposed, on deposit whereof in cash, the goods so
seized may be released in favour of the dealer or, as the case may be, the person
in charge:
Provided that the Commissioner or such other officer, not below the
rank of a Deputy Commissioner, as may be authorised in this behalf by the
Commissioner, may, for sufficient reasons to be recorded in writing, direct that
the goods be released without any deposit or on depositing such lesser amount,
or furnishing security in such form other than cash or indemnity bond, as he
may deem fit:
Provided further that in case of a person, who is not a registered
dealer and against whom penalty order referred to in sub-section (5) has been
passed, filing of return by such person and assessment of tax on him may not be
necessary.
(8) The penalty or such part thereof as remains after adjustment of any amount
deposited under sub-section (7) shall be deposited in the prescribed manner
within thirty days of the date of service of the copy of the order imposing the
penalty. In default, the assessing authority shall cause the goods to be sold in
such manner as may be prescribed and apply the sale proceeds thereof towards
the penalty imposed, and subject to the provisions of section 40, refund the
balance, if any, to the dealer or, as the case may be, to the person-in-charge.
(9) Where the officer seizing the goods, before forwarding the list and other
documents referred to in sub-section (3), or the assessing authority at any time
thereafter, is of the opinion that the goods are subject to speedy and natural
decay or where the tax assessed or penalty imposed, as the case may be, is not
deposited in accordance with the provisions of this Act, the officer seizing the
goods or the assessing authority, as the case may be, may, without prejudice to
any other action that may be taken in accordance with other provisions of this
Act, cause the goods to be sold by public auction in the prescribed manner. The
sale proceeds of such goods shall be adjusted towards the expenses of tax
assessed or penalty imposed. The balance, if any, shall be refunded to the
dealer or, as the case may be, the person in-charge in accordance with the
provisions of sub-section (8).
(10)If the amount deposited under sub-section (7) is more than the amount of
penalty imposed under sub-section (5), the excess amount so deposited shall be
refunded to the dealer or, as the case may be, the person in-charge by the
authority with whom it was so deposited, in accordance with the provisions of
section 40.
Advertisement