The Bombay High Court granted bail to 70-year-old Mohansingh Sitaram Naik, accused in a 2019 human sacrifice murder case. The decision, delivered on February 7, 2025, by Justice Shivkumar Dige, highlighted the accused’s advanced age, prolonged incarceration, and delays in commencing the trial as pivotal factors.
Background
The case (Crime No.4 of 2019) stems from a chilling incident in Satara district, where a young woman was allegedly murdered as part of a ritualistic human sacrifice. According to the prosecution, Naik conspired with others to slit the victim’s throat to gain prosperity and hidden wealth. Charges were filed under Sections 302 (murder), 201 (destruction of evidence), 120-B (criminal conspiracy), and 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code, alongside Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice and other Inhuman, Evil and Aghori Practices and Black Magic Act, 2013.
The prosecution alleged that Naik acted as a lookout during the crime. However, the defense contested the credibility of a key witness, Aniket Aatkari, whose statement implicating Naik was recorded three years post-incident.
Justice Dige acknowledged the gravity of the charges but emphasized Naik’s age and the two-year incarceration without trial commencement.
“The applicant is more than 70 years old, he has been behind bars for over two years. The trial has not yet begun, and it may take considerable time to conclude,” the Court observed.
The judge noted that Aatkari’s delayed testimony lacked immediacy, raising doubts about its reliability. Additionally, Naik’s counsel assured the Court that he would refrain from entering Satara District and comply with all bail conditions.
The State strongly opposed the bail plea, arguing that Naik played a central role in the conspiracy and posed a risk of witness intimidation or absconding.
“Applicant No.2 conspired with co-accused to kill the victim. He played a vital role in the crime,” contended the prosecution.
Despite these concerns, the Court found the defense’s assurances sufficient to mitigate risks.
Execute a Personal Recognizance Bond of ₹50,000 with one or two sureties.
Attend the nearest police station once a month until the trial concludes.
Prohibited from entering Satara District except for court appearances.
Inform the investigating officer of any changes to his residence or mobile number.
Barred from tampering with evidence or contacting witnesses.