The Jharkhand High Court has granted anticipatory bail to Abhay Kumar Mishra, observing that the mere filing of a charge sheet cannot automatically prevent a court from considering a plea for pre-arrest bail. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi held that every anticipatory bail application must be examined on its own facts rather than rejected on technical grounds.
Background of the Case
The case arose from Jagarnathpur Police Station Case No. 314 of 2017, in which Abhay Kumar Mishra was accused of offences including criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery and conspiracy in connection with the affairs of a school. According to the prosecution, irregularities were alleged in the construction of school classrooms, financial transactions and other administrative matters.
Appearing for the petitioner, senior counsel argued that Mishra had cooperated throughout the police investigation and that the charge sheet had already been filed in December 2023. It was also submitted that he had earlier enjoyed interim protection in connected proceedings and had already secured anticipatory bail in another case involving similar allegations.
The informant, appearing in person, opposed the plea, contending that summons had already been issued after cognizance and that the petitioner should appear before the trial court instead of seeking anticipatory bail. Allegations relating to school funds, building construction, tax issues and the appointment of the petitioner's wife as a teacher were also raised before the Court.
Court's Observation
Justice Dwivedi noted that the present matter arose from a police investigation and not from a private complaint. The Court distinguished a recent Supreme Court ruling relied upon by the informant, observing that the facts of that case were materially different.
The bench observed,
"The filing of a challan or charge-sheet is not, by itself, a bar to the grant of anticipatory bail. The court must consider the application on its merits and in light of the facts and circumstances of the case."
The Court further found that the petitioner had cooperated during the investigation and that many of the allegations raised by the informant would ultimately be examined during trial. It also noted that the petitioner's wife's appointment in 2009 appeared to have preceded his tenure as the school's secretary, making that aspect a matter requiring evidence during trial rather than a decisive factor at the bail stage.
Referring to the Supreme Court's decision in Ravindra Saxena v. State of Rajasthan, the High Court reiterated that anticipatory bail should not be refused merely because a charge sheet has been filed, particularly where the applicant's conduct during investigation does not indicate non-cooperation.
Decision
Allowing the application, the Jharkhand High Court directed Abhay Kumar Mishra to surrender before the trial court within three weeks. The Court ordered that, in the event of his surrender or arrest, he shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of ₹25,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to his cooperation in the trial and compliance with the conditions prescribed under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Case Details
Case Title: Abhay Kumar Mishra v. State of Jharkhand & Another
Case Number: A.B.A. No. 3354 of 2026
Judge: Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Decision Date: 24 June 2026
-300x169.webp)