In a significant development in Punjab's legal and political landscape, Senior Advocate Gurminder Singh has tendered his resignation as the Advocate General (AG) of Punjab. His resignation letter, dated March 30, was submitted to Chief Minister Bhagwant Singh Mann, marking the end of his 18-month tenure in the position.
"As I intend to resume my private practice, I am not inclined to continue on the post,"
Gurminder Singh stated in his resignation letter. His decision to step down adds to the series of AG resignations in Punjab, making him the fourth Advocate General to resign within the three-year tenure of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government.
Read Also:- Supreme Court Rules: Charge-Sheet Approval Not Mandatory by Appointing Authority Under Article 311
A Distinguished Legal Career
Senior Advocate Gurminder Singh has had a distinguished legal career spanning over three decades. He has been practicing law in the High Courts of Punjab & Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, and Delhi since 1989. His expertise and legal acumen have made him a trusted counsel in significant legal matters.
Over the years, he has served as standing counsel for prestigious institutions such as:
- Medical Council of India
- Dental Council of India
- Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)
- Punjab Vidhan Sabha
- Various State Boards and Corporations
Read Also:- Supreme Court Sets Aside Arrest and Remand: Emphasizes Compliance with Section 50 of CrPC
Gurminder Singh has played a pivotal role in multiple landmark legal cases. He was appointed Amicus Curiae by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in several Public Interest Litigations (PILs), reflecting the judiciary’s trust in his legal expertise.
Additionally, he previously served as Assistant Advocate General and Deputy Advocate General, contributing significantly to Punjab's legal framework.
One of his most notable contributions includes representing Civil Judges and Judicial Magistrates in Haryana in a crucial case concerning judicial promotions. The case challenged the state's decision to reject the High Court’s recommendations for promoting 13 judicial officers.
