The Kerala High Court recently delivered a significant judgment clarifying that a motorbike can be considered a 'dangerous weapon' under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) if it is intentionally used to cause harm to a person. The ruling came in a criminal revision petition filed by an accused challenging his conviction under Section 324 IPC.
Background of the Case
The case, Manoj v State of Kerala, revolved around an incident that occurred on May 11, 2005. The petitioner, Manoj, was accused of intentionally hitting his motorbike on the back of the second respondent (the complainant) while the latter was walking on a public road. The complainant sustained injuries to his lower lip and other parts of his body. The prosecution alleged that the act was motivated by the complainant's disapproval of the petitioner's relationship with his daughter.
Read also:- Madhya Pradesh High Court Stays 'Udaipur Files' Release by Applying Delhi HC Order
The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court convicted the petitioner under Section 324 IPC, sentencing him to six months of simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000. The conviction was later upheld by the Sessions Court, prompting the petitioner to file a criminal revision petition before the Kerala High Court.
The petitioner's counsel argued that a motorbike, being a means of conveyance, cannot be classified as a 'weapon' or 'instrument' under Section 324 IPC. They contended that the conviction was unsustainable as the motorbike did not fall under the category of dangerous weapons specified in the provision.
However, the High Court rejected this argument. Justice Kauser Edappagath elaborated on the statutory language of Section 324 IPC, which penalizes "voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means." The court emphasized that the term "instrument" is not restricted to objects inherently designed as weapons but includes any object used as a weapon to cause harm.
Read also:- Calcutta HC Enhances Maintenance: Lifestyle Continuity, Not Just Subsistence, Now the Benchmark
"The expression 'any instrument which is used as a weapon' gives a significantly broader scope to the said provision, capable of taking within it any instrument which does not have the characteristics of a weapon under normal circumstances, provided the same was used as a weapon to cause hurt."
The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Mathai v State of Kerala (2005), which held that whether an object qualifies as a dangerous weapon depends on its use and potential to cause harm in specific circumstances.
Read also:- Madras High Court: ED Cannot Act Without Predicate Offence or Proceeds of Crime
Key Observations
Definition of 'Instrument': The court referred to dictionaries and legal precedents to define "instrument" as any means or tool used to achieve a purpose, including objects not inherently designed as weapons.
Motorbike as a Weapon: While a motorbike is not a weapon by design, its potential to cause serious injury or death when used to strike someone qualifies it as a dangerous weapon under Section 324 IPC.
Intentional Act: The court noted that the petitioner's act was intentional, as evidenced by his statement to the complainant before the incident, ruling out the defense of accident.
Read also:- NDPS Act | Section 32B Does not Limit Power of Trial Court to Award Sentence Beyond Minimum Sentence: SC
Reduction in Sentence
Though the court upheld the conviction, it reduced the petitioner's sentence, considering the following factors:
- The incident occurred over 20 years ago.
- The petitioner had faced prolonged legal proceedings.
- The injuries sustained by the complainant were minor.
The court modified the sentence to "imprisonment till the rising of the court" and directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 50,000 as compensation to the complainant.
Case Name: Manoj v State of Kerala
Case No: Crl. Rev. Pet. No. 162 of 2013
Counsel for Petitioner: B. Mohanlal, Preeta P.S.
Counsel for Respondent: S. Rajeev, E.C. Bineesh (Public Prosecutor)