Logo
Court Book - India Code App - Play Store

advertisement

Kerala High Court Upholds Lulu Mall's Right to Charge Parking Fees, Rejects Plea Opposing Customer Parking Charges in Kochi

Vivek G.

Kerala High Court dismisses plea against Lulu Mall Kochi parking fees, confirming private malls can charge for parking, impacting shoppers across Kerala.

Kerala High Court Upholds Lulu Mall's Right to Charge Parking Fees, Rejects Plea Opposing Customer Parking Charges in Kochi

In a decision that could impact shoppers across Kerala, the Kerala High Court on Saturday, October 25, dismissed a challenge to parking fees at Lulu Mall in Kochi. The bench clarified that private mall owners have the authority to decide whether to levy charges for parking vehicles within their premises.

Read Also:- Bombay High Court refuses to compel Indian Bank to accept OTS proposal, says courts cannot rewrite financial contracts under Article 226

Background

The case stems from a petition filed by Bosco Louis, who questioned the legality of parking charges collected at Lulu Shopping Mall, Edappally. The mall, one of India’s largest, spans 68,000 square meters and provides ample parking facilities. While the basement alone has 1,083 slots, the mall also operates an adjacent multi-level car park, bringing the total to 4,387 parking spaces.

The petitioner argued that parking charges were unfair to customers and questioned whether a private entity could levy such fees within its premises. Earlier, a Single Judge had ruled in favor of the mall, holding that the owner could decide on charging for parking while offering its shopping facilities.

Dissatisfied with this ruling, Bosco Louis filed a writ appeal seeking to overturn the decision.

Read Also:- Bombay High Court refuses unconditional stay on ₹250 crore arbitral award in Mumbai Metro–L&T dispute over GST and extra work claims

Court’s Observations

The Division Bench, comprising Justices Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Syam Kumar V.M., closely examined the mall’s parking arrangements and the legal principles involved.

“The bench observed, ‘A private establishment offering services and facilities cannot be prohibited from determining whether to charge for parking, as this falls within their commercial discretion,’” sources present in the courtroom said.

The judges highlighted that Lulu Mall’s parking provisions not only met statutory requirements but also exceeded them significantly with the additional multi-level parking facility. The court noted that imposing fees for a service voluntarily provided by the mall did not violate any law.

Counsel for the appellant, Jacob Mathew, argued that parking charges should be regulated or waived to benefit the public. However, the bench found these submissions unpersuasive, emphasizing that the mall’s decision to charge fees was a matter of private commercial policy rather than public law.

Representatives for Lulu Mall, including Thomas P. Kuruvilla and other senior counsels, reiterated that the parking fees were clearly advertised, and customers voluntarily used the service, making the charges legitimate.

Read Also:- Kerala High Court Quashes Liquor Theft Conviction, Citing Flawed Evidence and Lack of Independent

Decision

After considering all arguments, the Kerala High Court dismissed the writ appeal, effectively upholding the earlier Single Judge’s ruling. This means Lulu Mall retains the right to levy parking charges for its customers, confirming that private commercial establishments in Kerala can decide on ancillary services like parking without judicial interference.

A detailed judgment is awaited, but the immediate effect is clear: shoppers must comply with the parking fee structure at Lulu Mall, and similar cases in the future may now reference this decision.

Case Title: Bosco Louis v. State of Kerala and Others

Case No.: WA 939/2023

Counsel for Appellant: Jacob Mathew

Counsel for Respondents:

  • K.R. Deepa – Government Pleader (R1 & R4)
  • S. Sreekumar (Sr.), P. Martin Jose, Prajith P., Githesh R., Manjunath Menon, Sachin Jacob Ambat, Harikrishnan S., Ajay Ben Jose, Anna Linda Eden, Hani P. Nair, Thomas P. Kuruvilla – Lulu Mall (R3)

Date of Decision: October 25, 2025

Advertisment