Logo
Court Book - India Code App - Play Store

advertisement

NCLAT upholds ₹213 crore fine on Meta but removes WhatsApp data-sharing ban, calls CCI’s finding on leveraging "unsustainable"

Vivek G.

NCLAT upholds ₹213 crore fine on Meta but lifts WhatsApp’s five-year data-sharing ban, partly overturning CCI’s abuse of dominance findings.

NCLAT upholds ₹213 crore fine on Meta but removes WhatsApp data-sharing ban, calls CCI’s finding on leveraging "unsustainable"

New Delhi, November 4 - The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Tuesday delivered a mixed verdict in Meta and WhatsApp’s challenge against the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) 2024 order penalising them for abuse of dominance over WhatsApp’s 2021 privacy policy update.

Read in Hindi

A two-member bench led by Justice (retd) Ashok Bhushan partly set aside the CCI’s directions that had barred WhatsApp from sharing user data with Meta companies for five years. The bench also rejected the Commission’s finding that Meta used WhatsApp’s dominance in the messaging space to boost its online advertising business, calling that portion of the order unsustainable.

Read also:- Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Husband’s Aunt and Cousin in Dowry Case, Calls Allegations Generic and Vague Under Section 498A IPC

However, the NCLAT upheld the ₹213.14 crore penalty imposed on Meta, agreeing with the CCI that the 2021 privacy policy had indeed forced users into accepting unfair terms without genuine consent. The tribunal observed that the 'take-it-or-leave-it' format of the update left no meaningful choice for Indian users, who rely heavily on WhatsApp for daily communication.

Appearing for Meta, Senior Advocate Amit Sibal argued that the Commission had 'overreached' its powers by treating data-sharing issues as competition violations. He said user data was not used for advertising unless users chose to interact with business accounts.

Read also:- Patna High Court Dismisses Writs Challenging Rejection of Nomination Papers, Says Election Disputes Must Be Raised Through Election Petitions Only

The CCI, represented by Additional Solicitor General Balbir Singh, countered that Meta’s massive network across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp gave it an 'unmatched hold' over users, and such dominance could not justify forcing consent through confusing privacy updates.

After nearly a year of hearings, the NCLAT concluded:

"Findings under Section 4(2)(e) and direction in para 247.1 are set aside; the rest of the order is upheld." With this, the ₹213 crore penalty remains, but the data-sharing ban stands quashed.

Advertisment