Logo

'I Can Have thousands Husbands Like You' Remark by Wife Amounted to Grave and Sudden Provocation: MP High Court Modifies Husband's Conviction

Shivam Y.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that a husband acted under grave and sudden provocation, reducing his conviction to Section 304 Part II IPC and cutting his sentence to seven years. - Shiva v. State of Madhya Pradesh

'I Can Have thousands Husbands Like You' Remark by Wife Amounted to Grave and Sudden Provocation: MP High Court Modifies Husband's Conviction
Join Telegram

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has modified the conviction of a man found guilty of causing the death of his wife, holding that the incident occurred in a moment of grave and sudden provocation rather than as a planned murder. The Court reduced the conviction from Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to Section 304 Part II and cut the sentence from life imprisonment to seven years of rigorous imprisonment.

Background of the Case

The appeal was filed by Shiva, who challenged the June 20, 2023 judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Chaurai, District Chhindwara. The trial court had convicted him under Section 304 Part I IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

According to the prosecution, the incident took place during the night of July 18–19, 2021, near the Kulbaheri river at Kharra Ghat. The prosecution alleged that Shiva caused the death of his wife, Kiran, by hitting her with a stone after an argument between them.

Evidence before the Court showed that soon after the incident, Shiva himself telephoned Kiran's relatives and also informed the police that his wife had died following the assault. The prosecution relied on these phone calls, witness testimonies, medical evidence, and the recovery of the stone allegedly used in the incident.

Arguments Before the High Court

The appellant argued that the prosecution's evidence was inconsistent and unreliable. It was also contended that the First Information Report had not been lodged directly by the complainant and that the conviction deserved to be set aside.

The State opposed the appeal, maintaining that the evidence clearly established Shiva's involvement in the incident and justified the conviction.

Court's Observations

After examining the evidence, the Division Bench found that the prosecution had successfully proved that the appellant caused the fatal injuries to his wife.

However, the Court carefully examined the circumstances surrounding the incident. It noted that the couple had been together near the river when an argument took place. During the exchange, Kiran allegedly remarked that she could "have thousands of husbands like him," a statement that immediately triggered the appellant's reaction.

The Bench observed that the incident was not pre-planned. The stone used in the assault was lying at the spot, and there was no material to suggest that the appellant had gone there intending to kill his wife.

The Court also attached significance to the fact that Shiva himself informed both the police and the deceased's relatives immediately after the occurrence.

The Bench observed,

"It was a case of grave and sudden provocation."

Referring to Exception 1 of Section 300 IPC, the Court held that where a person loses self-control because of grave and sudden provocation, the offence may amount to culpable homicide not amounting to murder rather than murder. The judges also relied on earlier Supreme Court and High Court decisions dealing with similar legal principles.

The Court further stated:

"When a wife refers to her husband that 'she can keep thousand husbands like him', it is an indirect reference to the worthlessness of the husband... Therefore, it can be treated as a sudden and grave provocation."

Medical Evidence Considered

The post-mortem report showed multiple injuries, including fractures of ribs and the sternum. The doctor opined that death occurred because of severe injuries to vital organs.

The High Court observed that the evidence did not conclusively establish repeated stone blows. It noted that only one stone had been seized and sent for medical examination, and some injuries could also be explained by the rocky riverbed where the body was found.

Court's Decision

Allowing the appeal in part, the Madhya Pradesh High Court altered the conviction from Section 304 Part I IPC to Section 304 Part II IPC.

The Court sentenced Shiva to seven years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of ₹1,000. In default of payment of the fine, he would undergo an additional one year of rigorous imprisonment.

The appeal was accordingly disposed of.

Case Details

Case Title: Shiva v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Case Number: Criminal Appeal No. 1863 of 2024

Judge: Justice Vivek Agarwal and Justice Avanindra Kumar Singh

Decision Date: 18 June 2026

Latest News