In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court addressed a petition filed by A.K. Basak seeking protection against alleged threats and harassment from a neighbor. The case, W.P.(CRL) 2498/2025, was presided over by Justice Girish Kathpalia, who issued specific directions to ensure the petitioner’s safety.
Background of the Case
The petitioner, represented by Advocate Shiv Gaur, claimed that his neighbor, Respondent No. 4, had been threatening and harassing him following a court order restraining construction activities on his property. Basak sought immediate police protection and urged the court to direct the Station House Officer (SHO) of Mehrauli Police Station to register his complaint and take preventive action.
During the proceedings, the learned Additional Standing Counsel (ASC) for the Delhi government, Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, informed the court that both parties were neighbors and had filed multiple complaints against each other. The petitioner’s counsel later chose not to press for the registration of a formal complaint, stating that alternative legal remedies would be pursued.
Read also:- Punjab Court Directs Swift Action to Address Delays in Medical Reports for Criminal Investigations
Justice Kathpalia disposed of the petition with a clear directive:
“The SHO PS Mehrauli is directed to communicate his mobile phone number and the mobile phone number of the beat constable to the petitioner and respond as and when the petitioner calls up in urgency.”
This order ensures that the petitioner can reach out to the police immediately in case of any threat or emergency. The court also disposed of the pending application, emphasizing the need for prompt action by the local police.
Key Takeaways
The judgment highlights the judiciary’s role in addressing urgent grievances, especially in disputes involving personal safety. By directing the SHO to share contact details, the court has provided a practical solution to mitigate immediate risks. The case also underscores the importance of neighborly disputes being handled with sensitivity and urgency by law enforcement.
For individuals facing similar threats, this ruling sets a precedent for seeking swift police intervention without waiting for formal complaints to be registered. The Delhi High Court’s proactive approach ensures that citizens’ safety remains a priority.
Case Title: A.K. Basak vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Case Number: W.P.(CRL) 2498/2025 & CRL.M.A. 23603/2025
