In a significant ruling balancing media freedom with the fundamental right to privacy, the Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by TV Today Network Limited and upheld an earlier order directing the broadcaster to pay ₹5 lakh as compensation for airing a news report that disclosed details capable of identifying a child who had alleged sexual abuse by her father.
A Division Bench held that the media performs an important public function and must exercise restraint while reporting sensitive cases, especially those involving children and survivors of sexual offences. The Court found no reason to interfere with the Single Judge's conclusion that the telecast violated the child's right to privacy and confidentiality.
Background of the Case
The dispute arose from an incident in August 2005 when a minor girl lodged an FIR against her father alleging sexual assault. According to the record, reporters from TV Today Network visited the family's residence after the complaint had been filed.
The child's mother refused to speak to the media and denied the crew permission to enter the house. Despite this, a report was aired on the Aaj Tak channel showing visuals and disclosing information including the father's identity, designation, workplace, the locality where the family lived, and other details which, according to the petitioners, made it possible for people in the community to identify the child.
Take CourtBook Everywhere
Access your account on the go with our mobile app.
The mother approached the Delhi High Court seeking compensation and other reliefs, alleging that the broadcast breached her daughter's constitutional right to privacy. In 2013, a Single Judge awarded ₹5 lakh as damages, prompting TV Today Network to file the present appeal.
Court Observations
Rejecting the broadcaster's challenge, the Division Bench held that the media cannot escape responsibility merely because another person may have disclosed certain information earlier.
The Court observed:
"Even if... ABC had... disclosed the identity of X, that would not provide a carte blanche to the rest of the world to go ahead and do likewise."
Emphasising that privacy belongs to the individual, the Bench added:
"The extent to which a citizen desires to enforce her, or his, right to privacy, is the exclusive prerogative of the citizen."
The judges also echoed the principle of respecting an individual's refusal to engage with the media, remarking:
"No means no."
The Court agreed with the earlier finding that the broadcaster should have withdrawn once the family clearly declined to interact with its reporters instead of recording and broadcasting material capable of exposing the child's identity.
One of the central questions before the Bench was whether a writ petition could be maintained against a private media company.
The Court answered in the affirmative, holding that while TV Today Network is a private entity, news organisations perform an important public function by disseminating information and shaping public discourse. Because of this public role, their actions can be examined under the High Court's writ jurisdiction when allegations involve violation of fundamental rights.
The judgment noted that the press enjoys public trust and therefore has a corresponding duty to report responsibly, particularly where disclosure could seriously harm an individual's dignity or privacy.
The broadcaster argued that disputed questions of fact required a civil suit and that compensation should not have been awarded in writ proceedings.
The Division Bench rejected this submission. It held that the issues involved were sufficiently clear and that the Single Judge was justified in granting compensation for the violation of the child's fundamental right to privacy.
The Court also refused to accept the argument that because certain details had appeared elsewhere, the broadcaster was free to disclose identifying information.
Decision
Dismissing the appeal, the Delhi High Court upheld the award of ₹5 lakh compensation. It directed TV Today Network Limited to pay the remaining amount to the child's mother or the victim within four weeks from the date the judgment was uploaded. The Court further ordered that failure to comply would attract interest at 12% per annum until payment is made. The matter has been listed on 12 August 2026 for reporting compliance.
Case Details:
Case Title: TV Today Network Limited v. ABC & Ors.
Case Number: LPA 264/2013 & CM Appl. 6818/2013
Judge: Justice C. Hari Shankar and Justice Om Prakash Shukla
Decision Date: 1 July 2026
