The Kerala High Court has clarified that a communication issued by the District Labour Officer asking CorroHealth Infotech Private Limited to maintain the status quo over its Kerala operations should not be treated as a binding direction. Instead, the court held that it forms part of the conciliation process under labour law while the dispute is being addressed.
Background of the Case
CorroHealth Infotech Private Limited approached the High Court challenging a communication issued by the District Labour Officer after the company decided to shut down its operations in Kerala. According to the company, circumstances beyond its control forced the closure, resulting in the retrenchment of nearly 800 employees. It also informed the court that retrenchment compensation had already been transferred to the affected employees' bank accounts.
The company argued that the Labour Officer could facilitate conciliation under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, but had no authority to compel it to continue employing workers during that process.
The State submitted that the closure had affected around 800 employees, most of them women, and stressed its responsibility to attempt a settlement. The Labour Minister had also convened a conciliation meeting, asking the company to participate.
Justice Gopinath P. observed,
"The State has a social obligation to attempt a conciliation, especially when a large number of employees are likely to lose employment."
The High Court clarified that the Labour Officer's communication should not be treated as a mandate requiring the company to continue its operations or retain employees. It held that the communication should only be viewed as part of the conciliation proceedings under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020. The court also recorded the company's undertaking to participate in the conciliation meeting scheduled by the Labour Department and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Case Details:
Case Title: CorroHealth Infotech Private Limited v. State of Kerala
Case Number: WP(C) No. 23270 of 2026
Judge: Justice Gopinath P.
Decision Date: 8 July 2026
















