September 6, 2026 – Recap Supreme Court & High Court Judgments/Orders

Here is the Sunday Recap of Important Judgments and Orders from the Supreme Court and the High Courts for September 6, 2026.

AP High Court Upholds Husband's Acquittal in Dowry Harassment Case, Says Same Evidence Can't Convict One Accused Alone

The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a wife's revision plea against her husband's acquittal in a dowry case, holding that identical evidence which failed to convict his sister could not sustain his conviction alone. Read more...

Bombay High Court Waives Surety Justification After All Legal Heirs Consent to Letters of Administration

The Bombay High Court dispensed with surety justification for an administration bond after three legal heirs consented to the petitioner receiving Letters of Administration. Justice Abhay Ahuja held that since all heirs had consented, no portion of the estate remained requiring justification by a surety. Read more...

Industrial Disputes Act | KSRTC Employee Entitled to Full Back Wages After Dismissal Without S. 33(2)(b) Approval: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court partly allowed M.K. Mohammed Ismail’s petition, granting full consequential benefits for the dismissal period after KSRTC failed to comply with Section 33(2)(b), while upholding the Labour Court’s penalty of withholding four annual increments. Read more...

Minor Remanded as Adult: Andhra Pradesh HC Orders Immediate Release, Imposes Rs.10,000 Costs on SHO

The Andhra Pradesh High Court set aside the remand of a minor after finding that his correct date of birth was 2008, not 2006. The Bench ordered his immediate release, allowed authorities to proceed under the Juvenile Justice Act, and imposed Rs.10,000 costs on the concerned police officer. Read more...

Creating Email ID in Another Person’s Name Does Not Prima Facie Attract Identity Theft Law: Allahabad HC Stays FIR Against Two Men

The Allahabad High Court stayed an FIR alleging defamation and identity theft, holding prima facie that creating an email ID in another person’s name does not fall within Section 66-C of the Information Technology Act, 2008, which specifically covers electronic signatures, passwords and unique identification features. Read more...

Trial Court Can Recall Witness After Reserving Case for Judgment Under S. 311 CrPC: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court dismissed Raman Soni’s challenge to a trial court order allowing the CBI to examine a witness after the case was reserved for judgment, holding that Section 311 CrPC may still be exercised when evidence is essential for a just decision. Read more...