Logo
Court Book - India Code App - Play Store

advertisement

Supreme Court Clears Path for Real Estate Projects, Rules State Bodies Can Grant Environmental Clearances

Vivek G.

Supreme Court ends year-long uncertainty, ruling state environment panels can clear construction near eco-sensitive zones, easing pressure on real estate projects.

Supreme Court Clears Path for Real Estate Projects, Rules State Bodies Can Grant Environmental Clearances

New Delhi, September 12: In a major relief to builders and thousands of homebuyers, the Supreme Court on Thursday set aside a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order that had forced all large construction projects near eco-sensitive zones to seek clearance from the Centre. The bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan ruled that state-level expert authorities remain fully competent to grant environmental approvals for such developments.

हिंदी में पढ़ें

Background

The dispute began when the NGT in August 2024 directed that every building or township project within five kilometres of protected forests, critically polluted zones or inter-state boundaries be treated as a high-risk “Category A” case, requiring central scrutiny. Real estate bodies like CREDAI, along with Godrej Properties and Sai Sahara Developers, argued this sudden shift paralysed projects and stranded homebuyers.

Read also: Supreme Court Quashes Karnataka’s Seizure of ITC Classmate Notebooks, Flags Major Procedural

The Ministry of Environment itself maintained that the original 2006 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) notification never intended central appraisal for ordinary construction, pointing out that its schedule left the relevant column for “General Conditions” blank for such projects.

Court’s Observations

“The 2006 notification does not provide for applicability of the General Conditions to projects in Entry 8(a) and 8(b),” the bench observed, stressing that wherever lawmakers wanted extra scrutiny, the schedule explicitly said so. The judges recalled earlier directions promoting decentralisation and noted that state environment authorities (SEIAAs) are “bodies of experts constituted by the Central Government itself and better equipped to assess local impacts.”

While emphasising sustainable development, the court added, “A country cannot progress unless development takes place. At the same time, precaution is needed so that the least damage is caused to the environment.”

Read also: Supreme Court Quashes Gujarat HC Order Allowing Counter-Claim in Family Property Dispute

Decision

Allowing the appeals filed by CREDAI and others, the Court upheld the Centre’s 2025 notification that reaffirmed state control over clearances but struck down a separate exemption for industrial and educational buildings. The judges concluded, “The impugned order dated 09.08.2024 of the NGT… does not survive for consideration. The 2025 notification, excluding Note 1 to Entry 8(a), presently holds the field.”

With this ruling, stalled housing and redevelopment projects across the country can resume approvals through their respective state environment bodies.

Case: Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India (CREDAI) & Others v. Union of India & Others

Decision Date: 12 September 2025

Advertisment