Logo
Court Book - India Code App - Play Store

advertisement

Delhi High Court Refuses Plea to Quash POCSO FIR, Calls Argument on Victim's Stigma "Obnoxious"

Shivam Y.

Altaf v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr. - Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR in POCSO case, calls stigma argument “obnoxious,” and directs proclaimed offender to pay ₹10,000 costs.

Delhi High Court Refuses Plea to Quash POCSO FIR, Calls Argument on Victim's Stigma "Obnoxious"

The Delhi High Court on Friday dismissed a petition filed by one Altaf seeking quashing of an FIR registered at Sarita Vihar police station under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The case, lodged as FIR No. 391/2024, involves allegations of sexual exploitation of a minor girl.

Read in Hindi

Justice Girish Kathpalia, while delivering the oral Judgment, noted that the petitioner had been declared a proclaimed offender and continued to evade the law. The prosecution strongly opposed the plea, highlighting that the victim in the case was still a minor. The court also took note of the allegations that the accused had blackmailed the girl into a physical relationship by making her video.

Read also:- Jharkhand High Court Grants Probate of Late Sitaram Lohia's 2008 Will, Confirms Biren Poddar as Executor of Multi-City Properties

The defence counsel argued that quashing the case would protect the victim from social stigma.

Rejecting this submission in strong words, Justice Kathpalia remarked,

"The stigma has to be, not on the victim of the wrong, but on the perpetrator of the wrong."

The court stressed the need for a "paradigm shift in societal mindset" by ensuring that the shame of such crimes is associated with the offender rather than the survivor.

Read also:- Delhi High Court Upholds Wife’s Right to Call Records, Hotel Proof in Adultery Divorce Case

The petitioner's lawyer further submitted that the girl's parents had settled the matter with the accused. The Judge dismissed this line of argument, clarifying that it was the girl, and not her parents, who had suffered. Since the prosecutrix remained a minor, the question of her pardoning the accused did not arise under law.

Concluding that there was no ground to interfere, the High Court dismissed the petition with costs of ₹10,000, directing the petitioner to deposit the amount with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee within one week. The trial court was asked to ensure compliance with the order.

Case TItle:- Altaf v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case Number: CRL.M.C. 2363/2025 & CRL.M.A. 10629/2025

Advertisment