Logo
Court Book - India Code App - Play Store

advertisement

Orissa High Court Confirms Life Imprisonment for Six Accused in 1994 Khurda Village Murder Case Sparked by Trivial Quarrel

Shivam Y.

Dinabandhu Dehury & Others v. State of Odisha - Orissa High Court upholds life sentences in Khurda murder case, ruling that a village quarrel turned deadly mob attack was proven beyond doubt.

Orissa High Court Confirms Life Imprisonment for Six Accused in 1994 Khurda Village Murder Case Sparked by Trivial Quarrel

The Orissa High Court has upheld the conviction and life imprisonment of several men found guilty of murdering a villager in Khurda nearly three decades ago. The judgment, delivered by Justice S.K. Sahoo and Justice Chittaranjan Dash, reaffirmed that even a minor quarrel can snowball into grave violence when not handled wisely.

Read in Hindi

Background

The case dates back to August 1994, when a village video show in Tandalo, under Begunia police limits, turned into tragedy. According to the prosecution, one of the accused passed lewd comments at a girl, which led to heated protests from her family. What began as a trivial altercation soon escalated into a violent clash between two groups of villagers.

Read also:- Delhi High Court Dismisses Arbitration Request in Paschim Vihar Collaboration Property Dispute Between Builder and Owners

The mob violence that followed left houses ransacked and villagers injured. The most shocking outcome was the brutal killing of Jadumani Behera, the father of the girl. Witnesses stated that the accused, armed with weapons like axes, lathis and sharp blades, chased him down and assaulted him in a paddy field. His body was later found dumped nearby.

During trial, the prosecution examined multiple eyewitnesses and medical experts. The post-mortem revealed several cut wounds and fractures, confirming a homicidal death. The trial court in Khurda convicted Dinabandhu Dehury, Sridhar Behera, Tikina Pradhan, Gouranga Pradhan, Gagan Pradhan and Madhab Behera under sections 147, 148 and 302/149 of the IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment.

Read also:- Allahabad High Court Orders Inquiry Under Section 340 CrPC Into Alleged Forgery in Anticipatory Bail Case

The convicts challenged the verdict, arguing that eyewitness accounts were contradictory and medical evidence did not fully match the allegations. Defence counsel claimed that, at most, the case amounted to culpable homicide, not murder.

Rejecting these arguments, the High Court observed:

"The concerted action of the accused, armed with deadly weapons, clearly proves their participation in furtherance of a common object."

Read also:- Kerala High Court: Trial Judges Must Personally View Obscene Videos Before Conviction

The bench emphasized that minor inconsistencies in witness testimony cannot overshadow the overall credibility of the prosecution case.

The Court further noted that,

"the cause of death was not a single head injury alone but multiple fatal injuries inflicted with sharp and blunt weapons."

Holding that the evidence of eyewitnesses was consistent with medical reports, the judges upheld the conviction and sentence.

Case Title: Dinabandhu Dehury & Others v. State of Odisha

Case No.: Criminal Appeal (CRA) No. 02 of 1998

Advertisment