The Madras High Court has upheld a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of ₹2.92 crore to the family of an ISRO scientist who died after his motorcycle collided with a parked TATA Ace vehicle on Chennai's Outer Ring Road. Rejecting the insurer's plea that the deceased was partly responsible for the accident, the court held that the dangerous parking of the goods vehicle was the sole cause of the fatal crash.
Background of the Case
The case arose from an accident on December 31, 2019, when R.S. Pugazhenthi, a scientist at the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, was riding his motorcycle on the Minjur–Vandalur Outer Ring Road. His motorcycle struck the rear of a TATA Ace vehicle that had been parked on the left side of the road near the entry to an elevated stretch without adequate warning. He suffered fatal injuries at the scene.
His wife, minor son and mother approached the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Thiruvallur, seeking compensation. The Tribunal found the driver of the TATA Ace negligent and awarded compensation of ₹2,92,69,944 with interest. Tata AIG General Insurance challenged that finding before the High Court.
Court's Observations
A Division Bench comprising Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Justice K. Rajasekar examined the evidence of the eyewitness, the driver of the parked vehicle, the FIR, photographs and the Motor Vehicle Inspection Report.
The court noted that the TATA Ace had been parked on the lane generally used by two-wheelers at the entry to an elevated section of the Outer Ring Road, where visibility was limited because of the slope.
The bench observed,
"The parking of TATA Ace vehicle was the root cause for the accident."
It further held that although the deceased may have been travelling at a high speed, that alone could not amount to negligence because the Outer Ring Road was specifically designed for fast-moving traffic.
Rejecting the insurer's argument of contributory negligence, the court said,
"Fixing up of contributory negligence on the deceased would not be proper," adding that the vehicle had been parked at a crucial point on the road, triggering the collision.
The judges also took note of the police investigation, which resulted in a charge sheet against the driver of the parked vehicle, observing that there was no material to rebut those proceedings.
Decision
Finding no error in the Tribunal's conclusion on negligence, the High Court confirmed that the accident occurred solely because of the negligent parking of the TATA Ace vehicle. Since the insurer had not challenged the quantum of compensation, the court also upheld the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.
Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by Tata AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. was dismissed, and the Tribunal's award remained unchanged.
Case Details
Case Title: Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. P. Ammu & Others
Case Number: CMA No. 1163 of 2024
Judge: Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Justice K. Rajasekar
Decision Date: 03 June 2026
 Department-300x169.webp)
