The Delhi High Court has directed police authorities to provide protection to a married couple who alleged threats to their safety from the woman’s father. The court emphasized the couple’s right to live with dignity and freedom.
Background of the Case
The petition was filed by Kirti and another individual under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking protection of their life and liberty. According to the plea, both individuals are adults who married on March 18, 2026, following Hindu Vedic customs.
Read also:- Loan EMIs Can’t Reduce Wife’s Rights, Maintenance Raised to ₹25k per Month: Supreme Court
The couple alleged that the woman’s father had been intimidating them and issuing threats of serious physical harm. Due to fear, they were not residing at their stated address in Delhi but expressed their intention to settle there soon.
Hearing the matter, Justice Saurabh Banerjee noted that both petitioners are consenting adults and have the fundamental right to choose their life partner.
“The petitioners are grown up consenting individuals… entitled to lead their respective lives with liberty and dignity,” the court observed.
Read also:- Bombay HC Flags Procedural Lapse in Child Care Leave Denial, Disposes Plea as Issue Becomes Infructuous
The judge also highlighted that such rights are protected under Part III of the Constitution, which guarantees fundamental rights, including personal liberty.
Referring to past rulings like Shafin Jahan vs. Asokan K.M. and Lata Singh vs. State of U.P., the court reiterated that adults have the autonomy to marry by choice and must be protected from interference even from family members.
Taking note of the circumstances, the court allowed the petition and issued directions to ensure the couple’s safety.
The court stated that the petitioners may approach the Station House Officer (SHO) or the concerned Beat Constable at Police Station Sangam Vihar whenever they require assistance.
Read also:- Supreme Court Flags Delays in Legal Aid Appeals, Issues Binding Timelines to Speed Up Justice for Prisoners
“The SHO and concerned Beat Constable shall take all possible steps to provide adequate assistance and protection… in accordance with law,” the bench directed.
Additionally, the court clarified that if the couple shifts residence to another area, they must inform the local police station within three days. The concerned SHO would then be responsible for extending similar protection.
The High Court disposed of the petition with directions to ensure police protection for the couple whenever needed, affirming their right to live safely and independently.
Case Details:
Case Title: Kirti & Anr. vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Case Number: W.P.(CRL) 1203/2026
Judge: Justice Saurabh Banerjee
Decision Date: April 15, 2026
