Logo
Court Book - India Code App - Play Store

advertisement

Supreme Court Upholds Delhi HC Ruling: Cheque Bounce Notice Invalid If Amount Differs from Cheque

Vivek G.

Supreme Court rules typo no excuse: cheque-bounce notice invalid if it demands more or less than actual cheque amount.

Supreme Court Upholds Delhi HC Ruling: Cheque Bounce Notice Invalid If Amount Differs from Cheque

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to revive a cheque-bounce case filed by Kaveri Plastics, firmly holding that a statutory demand notice must mention the exact cheque amount-no more, no less. The bench of Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice N.V. Anjaria dismissed the company’s appeal, saying even a “typographical error” cannot rescue a notice that demands a different figure.

हिंदी में पढ़ें

Background

Kaveri Plastics had entered into a 2012 land-sale understanding with Nafto Gaz India Pvt. Ltd. When a cheque for ₹1 crore bounced for “funds insufficient,” the company sent two legal notices seeking payment of ₹2 crore instead. The respondent challenged the complaint in the Delhi High Court, arguing that the mismatch between the cheque amount and the notice violated Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act). The High Court agreed and quashed the case in February 2024, prompting this appeal.

Read also: Supreme Court Clears New AIFF Constitution, Backs Player Representation and Governance Reforms in Indian Football

Court’s Observations

Justice Anjaria recounted that Section 138(b) requires the payee to “make a demand for the payment of the said amount of money”-meaning the cheque amount itself. Citing earlier rulings like Suman Sethi v. Ajay K. Churiwal, the bench stressed that a penal statute demands strict compliance.

“The notice has to be precise,” the bench observed. “Even a typographical error can be no defence when the law mandates that the ‘said amount’ must match the cheque.”

The judges noted that Kaveri Plastics repeated the higher figure in two separate notices, undermining any plea of mere oversight. “Elastic interpretation cannot be adopted,” the court said, calling the NI Act a “technical offence” that leaves no room for ambiguity.

Read also: Supreme Court Questions Vodafone’s Fresh AGR Dues Plea Despite Earlier Final Order, Hearing Set for Next Week

Decision

Finding no merit in the appeal, the Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court’s order and dismissed Kaveri Plastics’ complaint. With this, the respondent stands free of the cheque-bounce prosecution. The judgment underscores that anyone issuing a legal notice for a dishonoured cheque must demand exactly the cheque amount-nothing more-if they wish to sustain criminal proceedings.

Case Title: Kaveri Plastics vs. Mahdoom Bawa Bahrudeen Noorul – Cheque Bounce Notice Amount Mismatch

Date of Judgment: 19 September 2025

Advertisment