In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court quashed an FIR filed under Sections 498A (cruelty by husband), 406 (criminal breach of trust), and 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The decision came after the complainant and the petitioner resolved their disputes mutually following their divorce.
Background of the Case
The petitioner, Shailender Chauhan, approached the High Court seeking the quashing of FIR No. 54/2018, registered at PS South Rohini. The case stemmed from marital discord between Chauhan and his wife (respondent no.2). The complainant had accused him of cruelty and misappropriation of her stridhan (marital gifts). However, after their divorce was finalized on April 8, 2024, the parties reached a settlement.
During the hearing, respondent no.2 appeared in court and was identified by the Investigating Officer, Inspector Gyaneshwar Singh. She confirmed that the marriage had been dissolved and stated that she had received her entire stridhan. Notably, she waived her right to maintenance or alimony and expressed no intention to pursue further legal action against the petitioner.
Read also:- Supreme Court Grants Additional 42.95 Lakh Compensation in Rajinder Singh Accident Case
"Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through trial."
- Justice Girish Kathpalia
The State, represented by Additional Public Prosecutor Ms. Manjeet Arya, also raised no objections to the quashing of the FIR.
Justice Girish Kathpalia, after reviewing the settlement terms and the complainant’s statements, ruled in favor of the petitioner. The court emphasized the importance of amicable resolutions in matrimonial disputes, especially when both parties have moved on. Consequently, the FIR and all related proceedings were quashed.
Read also:- Supreme Court Declares Final Result for Senior Personal Assistant Recruitment 2025
Key Takeaways
- Mutual Settlement: The case highlights how mutual agreements can lead to the resolution of criminal proceedings in marital disputes.
- Legal Implications: The judgment reinforces the judiciary’s inclination to encourage settlements in cases where parties have resolved their differences.
- Stridhan and Alimony: The complainant’s waiver of alimony and confirmation of receiving her stridhan played a pivotal role in the court’s decision.
Case Title: Shailender Chauhan vs. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Case No.: CRL.M.C. 5414/2025
