The Gujarat High Court has upheld the dismissal of a police constable convicted in a corruption case, ruling that no prior show-cause notice is required when termination follows a criminal conviction. The Court dismissed the plea challenging the removal from service, reinforcing the legal position under Article 311 of the Constitution.
Background of the Case
The case involved a police constable appointed in 2001, who was later booked in 2010 by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) under provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. After trial, a sessions court convicted him in April 2019.
Following this conviction, the disciplinary authority dismissed him from service in July 2019. His appeal and revision before departmental authorities were also rejected, leading him to approach the High Court.
Read also:- Election Duty Vehicle Accident: Supreme Court Fixes Liability on State, Not Insurer
The constable argued that his dismissal was illegal because no show-cause notice or opportunity of hearing was given before passing the order.
Counsel for the petitioner contended that:
- The dismissal violated principles of natural justice
- Even after conviction, a government employee must be given a chance to respond
- Authorities failed to consider this procedural requirement
It was argued that absence of a show-cause notice made the dismissal legally unsustainable.
The State opposed the plea, asserting that:
- The petitioner stood convicted in a corruption case
- Under the constitutional framework and service rules, no prior notice is required in such cases
- Allowing a convicted person to continue in the police force would be against public interest
The State emphasized that once conviction is not stayed, dismissal is justified.
Read also:- Plastic Doll Used to Explain Crime: Chhattisgarh HC Affirms Life Term in Rape Case
Justice Maulik J. Shelat examined whether a show-cause notice is mandatory before dismissal following conviction.
The Court relied heavily on the constitutional provision under Article 311(2), particularly its second proviso, which allows dismissal without inquiry when a government servant is convicted on a criminal charge.
The bench observed:
“When the conduct of a government servant leads to conviction, the requirement of inquiry or opportunity can be dispensed with under the Constitution.”
The Court clarified that:
- The disciplinary authority must assess the seriousness of the conduct
- However, no prior hearing is necessary in such cases
- The process is constitutionally valid and not a violation of natural justice
Importantly, the Court disagreed with earlier High Court rulings that insisted on notice, stating they were contrary to binding Supreme Court precedent.
Read also:- 'Insensitive Investigation': Supreme Court Questions Gurugram Police Handling of Minor’s Case
The Court noted that:
- Police personnel are governed by specific service laws
- These laws align with the constitutional exception allowing dismissal without notice after conviction
- The disciplinary authority had properly considered the conviction and its seriousness
The judge also emphasized that corruption by public servants is a serious concern and cannot be treated lightly.
After reviewing the facts and legal position, the Court found no illegality in the dismissal order.
It held that:
- No show-cause notice was required before dismissal
- The disciplinary authority acted within legal bounds
- The petitioner’s conviction justified removal from service
Accordingly, the High Court dismissed the petition and upheld the dismissal order.
Case Title: Piyushbhai Bhagvatbhai Gamit vs State of Gujarat & Ors.
Case Number: R/Special Civil Application No. 7162 of 2022
Judge: Justice Maulik J. Shelat
Decision Date: 20 March 2026
