Logo
Court Book - India Code App - Play Store

advertisement

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation in Arbitration Cases: Knowledge of Award Must Reach Competent Authority

Shivam Y.

M/s. Motilal Agarwala vs. State of West Bengal & Anr. - Supreme Court rules that limitation in arbitration cases begins only when a signed award reaches the competent authority, not junior officers.

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation in Arbitration Cases: Knowledge of Award Must Reach Competent Authority

The Supreme Court of India, in a Judgment delivered by Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K.V. Viswanathan, has Dismissed an appeal filed by M/s Motilal Agarwala against the State of West Bengal, upholding the Calcutta High Court's decision that an arbitral award must be served directly on the competent authority of the State, and not just an authorised representative, to trigger the limitation period for challenging it.

Read in Hindi

The Dispute began after an arbitral award dated 12 November 2013 went in favour of the appellant. The State, unaware of the award, came to know about it only during execution proceedings. Though a xerox copy signed by the arbitrator had been collected by a Junior officer, the State contended that it never reached the Secretary or Executive Engineer, who were the actual parties to the arbitration.

Read also:- Allahabad High Court Strengthened with 26 Fresh Judges Approved by SC Collegium

The District Court had earlier dismissed the State's plea as time-barred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but the High Court overturned this view.

While analysing the matter, the Supreme Court examined Section 31(5) of the Act, which mandates that a signed copy of the arbitral award be delivered to each "party." Referring to earlier cases such as Union of India vs. Tecco Trichy Engineers & Contractors and Benarsi Krishna Committee vs. Karmyogi Shelters Pvt. Ltd., the bench explained that "party" refers only to those authorised to take decisions on behalf of the organisation.

Read also:- Supreme Court Restores NCLT Order, Declares Shailja Krishna Sole Owner of Shares

"Delivery of the award under Section 31 is not a matter of mere formality. It is a matter of substance,"

The court emphasised, making it clear that limitation for filing objections under Section 34 begins only when the competent authority, such as the Secretary or Executive Engineer, receives the signed copy.

By dismissing the appeal, the Supreme Court confirmed that the State's challenge against the award was within time.

Case TItle:- M/s. Motilal Agarwala vs. State of West Bengal & Anr.

Case Number: Civil Appeal No. 4480 of 2016

Advertisment