The Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by Indian karate athlete Akshay Mahara seeking urgent intervention in the selection process for the 2026 Asian Games. While refusing to interfere with an interim order passed by a single judge, the court expressed concern over the continuing governance issues in Indian karate and observed that athletes should not be made to bear the consequences of administrative failures.
Background of the Case
Akshay Mahara approached the High Court claiming that Indian karate athletes were being denied a fair opportunity to compete in international events due to the absence of a recognised National Sports Federation (NSF) for karate.
According to the athlete, the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports had issued an order in February 2026 directing the formation of a temporary or ad-hoc committee to manage karate affairs, including athlete selection for international competitions. However, he alleged that no effective mechanism had been put in place and that selections for major events were taking place without transparency.
The athlete argued that the matter was time-sensitive because the entry window for karate events at the 2026 Asian Games was open only for a limited period. He sought urgent protective directions before the selection deadlines expired.
During the hearing, the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) informed the court that it had acted on the Ministry’s directions and had written to the World Karate Federation (WKF) seeking approval for an ad-hoc committee.
The court noted that the WKF had opposed such a committee and had clearly stated that athletes selected by any committee not recognised by it would not be allowed to participate in international events conducted under its umbrella.
Referring to correspondence placed on record, the bench found that the authorities had made efforts to implement the Ministry’s proposal but faced resistance from the international governing body.
Rejecting the appellant’s contention that no steps had been taken, the bench observed that the documents before it showed attempts by the IOA to establish a workable mechanism.
At the same time, the judges expressed concern over the larger situation affecting the sport.
“The absence of a recognised NSF for Karate is detrimental to the development of the sport in India,” the bench observed.
The court further remarked that athletes should not suffer because of “administrative inaction and unresolved governance issues” and that their opportunities to participate in international events must not be compromised.
The Division Bench held that the order challenged by the athlete was only an interim procedural order and did not amount to a judgment that could be appealed under the Letters Patent.
Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and the connected applications. However, it reiterated that the authorities should continue efforts to create an appropriate mechanism for athlete selection and international entries in karate until a duly recognised National Sports Federation is established in India.
No order as to costs was passed.
Case Details
Case Title: Akshay Mahara v. Union of India & Ors.
Case Number: LPA 448/2026
Judges: Justice Tejas Karia and Justice Madhu Jain
Decision Date: June 15, 2026
