In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the discharge of three accused in a dowry death case. The court ruled that there was insufficient evidence to establish charges under Sections 498A (cruelty) and 304B (dowry death) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The case revolved around the death of Ms. Shashi, who allegedly faced harassment for dowry but died due to pneumonia, a natural cause.
Background of the Case
The petitioner, Gainda Lal, father of the deceased, accused his son-in-law (Respondent No. 3) and other family members of subjecting his daughter to dowry harassment. He claimed that despite spending Rs. 4 lakhs on her wedding, the accused demanded more dowry, including a gold bracelet and a motorcycle. Ms. Shashi died shortly after giving birth to her second daughter, and the petitioner alleged that her death was a result of continuous harassment.
However, the post-mortem report confirmed that Ms. Shashi died of pneumonia, a natural cause. The trial court and the Sessions Judge had earlier discharged the accused under Section 304B IPC, noting the absence of evidence linking her death to dowry harassment.
Read also:- Supreme Court Tells Sanjay Singh to Seek Relief from Allahabad High Court Over Closure of UP Schools
The High Court examined the statements of the complainant, his family, and medical reports. It observed that the allegations were vague and lacked specific instances of dowry demands or cruelty.
"Cruelty under Section 498A IPC must be of such nature as to drive the woman to commit suicide or cause grave injury. Mere allegations without proof are insufficient."
The court referred to precedents like State of Orissa vs. Devendra Nath Padhi and Dara Lakshmi Narayana vs. State of Telangana, emphasizing that vague complaints without precise details cannot sustain criminal charges.
Read also:- High Court Upholds Family Court’s Decision Denying Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty
Key Observations:
- Natural Cause of Death: The medical report conclusively stated pneumonia as the cause, ruling out foul play.
- Contradictory Statements: The petitioner’s claims lacked consistency, and no evidence of monetary transactions or threats was provided.
- No Prima Facie Case: The court found no material to suggest harassment or unlawful dowry demands.
The High Court upheld the lower courts’ orders, dismissing the petition. It reiterated that criminal charges require concrete evidence, and unsubstantiated allegations cannot form the basis for prosecution. The judgment underscores the importance of thorough investigation and precise allegations in dowry-related cases.
Case Title: Gainda Lal v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
Case No.: CRL.M.C. 4785/2017
