The Kerala High Court took up a fresh public interest litigation challenging the title of the recently released film The Kerala Story 2: Goes Beyond. The petitioners have sought directions to remove the words “Kerala” or “Keralam” from the film’s title, alleging that it unfairly targets the State and its Muslim community.
Background of the Case
The plea has been filed by two individuals - a retired social science teacher and a Muslim woman advocate practicing before the High Court. They argue that the inclusion of “Kerala” in the film’s title creates a misleading impression that the State is a centre for forced religious conversions and extremist activities.
Last week, the film’s release saw dramatic courtroom developments. A Single Judge had initially stayed its release, noting that certain scenes in the teaser had the potential to disturb communal harmony. However, the producer immediately appealed.
In an urgent evening hearing, the Division Bench lifted the stay, observing that the Central Board of Film Certification had viewed the film in full before granting certification.
“The certification cannot be said to be without application of mind,” the Bench had noted.
The present PIL raises concerns over the speed at which the appeal was listed. The petition states that the matter was mentioned before the Division Bench even before the detailed interim order of the Single Judge was uploaded.
The plea further argues that the film portrays over 150 characters professing Islamic faith in a manner that reinforces stereotypes. It claims this depiction, combined with the State’s name in the title and the assertion that the story is inspired by true events, creates hostility toward Muslims in Kerala.
The petitioners have relied on past observations of the Supreme Court of India, which had earlier remarked that inflated figures relating to forced conversions were not based on authentic data. They have also cited the ruling in Atul Mishra v. Union of India, where the Court cautioned against using film titles to denigrate communities.
The petitioners have sought directions to the Union Government and the CBFC to ensure that the film is not exhibited under a title containing “Kerala” or “Keralam.” They have also asked for a disclaimer stating that the film is fictional and unsupported by official data.
Additionally, they have requested that clear guidelines be framed to regulate film titles and marketing to prevent stereotyping of any State or community.
The matter is now pending before the Kerala High Court.
Case Title: Chandramohan K.C. and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
Case No.: WP(PIL) 39/2026
