The Supreme Court of India has officially released a recruitment advertisement dated 25 July 2025, inviting online applications from eligible Indian citizens for multiple posts across different cadres. This recruitment drive aims to fill vacant positions in the Registry and Museum departments of the Supreme Court.

हिंदी में पढ़ें

All applications must be submitted online through the official Supreme Court website: www.sci.gov.in

Vacancies and Eligibility Criteria

1. Assistant Editor, Supreme Court Reports (05 Posts)

• Category: UR – 5
• Pay Level: Level 12 (₹78,800/- + allowances)
• Age: 30 to 40 years
• Qualification: Degree in Law (recognized by Bar Council of India), English Bar Member, or Attorney of High Court
• Experience: Minimum 3 years in one of the following roles: Advocate in High Court/Supreme Court, judicial post, legal research, law reporting, or teaching law
• Exam Pattern:
  • Written Test (2 hours):
    • Part A: Precis Writing & Editorial Skills (100 marks, 50 qualifying)
    • Part B: Law and Constitution (100 marks, 50 qualifying)
  • Interview: 25 marks (13 qualifying)

Read also: Supreme Court: Mangalore Has Jurisdiction in Cheque Bounce Case, Not Mumbai

2. Assistant Director (Ex-cadre), Supreme Court Museum (01 Post)

• Category: UR – 1
• Pay Level: Level 11 (₹67,700/- + allowances)
• Age: 30 to 40 years
• Qualification: First Class Master's in Museology
• Experience: 5 years of documented research work in a reputed museum
• Exam Pattern:
  • Written Test (3 hours): English, GK, Aptitude (30 marks), Museology/History (70 marks)
  • Computer Test: Qualifying only
  • Interview: 25 marks (13 qualifying)

3. Senior Court Assistant (Ex-cadre), Supreme Court Museum (02 Posts)

• Category: UR – 2
• Pay Level: Level 8 (₹47,600/- + allowances)
• Age: Max 35 years
• Qualification: High Second Class (55%) Master’s in Museology
• Experience: 2 years in Museology or as Assistant Curator
• Exam Pattern: Same as Assistant Director

Read also: Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Charge-Sheet Issued by Telecom GM Without Higher Approval

4. Assistant Librarian (14 Posts)

• Category: UR – 10, SC – 3, ST – 1
• Pay Level: Level 8 (₹47,600/- + allowances)
• Age: Max 30 years
• Qualification: Degree in Library Science + Computer Application Diploma
• Experience: 2 years in a University/Law Library
• Exam Pattern:
  • Written Test (3 hours): English, GK, Aptitude (30 marks), Library Management (70 marks)
  • Computer Test (1 hour): 100 marks
  • Interview: 25 marks
  "Minimum qualifying marks differ for General and Reserved categories."

Important Exam & Selection Guidelines

“Candidates qualifying the written test will be shortlisted in the ratio of 1:3 for interviews or 1:10 for computer tests based on posts.”

• Test Cities: Delhi/NCR, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai
• Interview Location: Delhi
• Relaxation: Age relaxations apply to SC/ST/OBC/PwD/Ex-Servicemen/Freedom Fighter dependents as per Govt. rules
• No Age Limit: For existing Supreme Court Registry employees
• Application Mode: Online only
• Fee: ₹1500 (UR/OBC), ₹750 (SC/ST/Ex-Servicemen/PwD) – Non-refundable
• Payment: Online via UCO Bank gateway only

Read also: SC Allows Withdrawal of Divorce Plea Under Article 142

Important Instructions & Conditions

"Applications not complying with the instructions shall be summarily rejected."

• One application per post is required
• All scanned documents, photos, and signatures must be uploaded in the online form
• No request for modification in category or details will be accepted after submission
• Candidates must retain their application number and print their form for records
• Admit cards will be available online; no postal delivery
• Misconduct or false information at any stage will lead to disqualification

Application Dates

The starting and closing dates for online applications will be notified shortly on the official website. Candidates are advised to regularly visit www.sci.gov.in for updates.

The Delhi High Court, on July 25, 2025, granted anticipatory bail to Pawan Kumar Singh, who was accused in FIR No. 491/2025 registered at Police Station S.P. Badli. The case involved alleged offences under Sections 110, 115(2), 126(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Read in Hindi

Court Proceedings and Arguments

The anticipatory bail application, listed as Bail Appln. 2738/2025 along with CRL.M.A. 21355/2025, was heard by Justice Girish Kathpalia.

The petitioner was represented by Advocate Mr. Surender Yadav, while the State was represented by Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, Additional Public Prosecutor, and the Investigating Officer, SI Amit Sehrawat.

Read also:- FIR Quashed by Punjab & Haryana High Court After Amicable Settlement Between Husband and Wife

The defense argued that the FIR was questionable in its legitimacy since a Kalandra under Section 126/170 of BNSS had already been registered before the FIR for the same incident. The defense also emphasized that the petitioner could not participate in the investigation due to his ongoing examinations.

Additionally, it was brought to the court’s attention that the co-accused in the same matter had already been granted bail. This further strengthened the petitioner’s case for anticipatory relief.

"It is argued that for the same incident, FIR No.491/2025 was registered after registration of Kalandra under Section 126/170 BNSS, therefore, the genuineness of the FIR is suspect," submitted the counsel for the accused.

Read also:- SC Restores Rs.25.82 Lakh Compensation to Driver’s Family in Tyre Burst Accident Case

On behalf of the State, the Additional Public Prosecutor accepted the notice and clearly stated that the State had no serious objection to granting anticipatory bail. However, it was emphasized that the petitioner must cooperate with the investigation, especially in aiding the recovery of the kada (metal bangle) allegedly involved in the case.

"The State has no serious objection to grant of anticipatory bail provided the accused/applicant joins investigation and helps in recovery of kada," stated the Additional Public Prosecutor.

After hearing both sides and considering that the co-accused were already out on bail, and the State did not oppose the bail strongly, the High Court granted anticipatory bail to Pawan Kumar Singh. The bail is subject to the accused furnishing a personal bond of ₹10,000 with one surety of the same amount.

Read also:- Kerala HC: No Legal Protection for Cheque Bounce Cases Involving Cash Loans Above ₹20,000 Without Valid Proof

“In view of no objection from State, the application is allowed… Pending application stands disposed of,” held Justice Girish Kathpalia.

The court directed that the bail would be effective in the event of the applicant’s arrest, and required him to cooperate fully with the investigating authorities.

Case Title: Pawan Kumar Singh vs. State (NCT of Delhi)

Case Number: Bail Application No. 2738/2025 & CRL.M.A. 21355/2025

FIR No.: 491/2025, Police Station: S.P. Badli, Delhi

The Delhi High Court, on July 25, 2025, granted anticipatory bail to Pawan Kumar Singh, who was accused in FIR No. 491/2025 registered at Police Station S.P. Badli. The case involved alleged offences under Sections 110, 115(2), 126(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Read in Hindi

Court Proceedings and Arguments

The anticipatory bail application, listed as Bail Appln. 2738/2025 along with CRL.M.A. 21355/2025, was heard by Justice Girish Kathpalia.

The petitioner was represented by Advocate Mr. Surender Yadav, while the State was represented by Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, Additional Public Prosecutor, and the Investigating Officer, SI Amit Sehrawat.

Read also:- FIR Quashed by Punjab & Haryana High Court After Amicable Settlement Between Husband and Wife

The defense argued that the FIR was questionable in its legitimacy since a Kalandra under Section 126/170 of BNSS had already been registered before the FIR for the same incident. The defense also emphasized that the petitioner could not participate in the investigation due to his ongoing examinations.

Additionally, it was brought to the court’s attention that the co-accused in the same matter had already been granted bail. This further strengthened the petitioner’s case for anticipatory relief.

"It is argued that for the same incident, FIR No.491/2025 was registered after registration of Kalandra under Section 126/170 BNSS, therefore, the genuineness of the FIR is suspect," submitted the counsel for the accused.

Read also:- SC Restores Rs.25.82 Lakh Compensation to Driver’s Family in Tyre Burst Accident Case

On behalf of the State, the Additional Public Prosecutor accepted the notice and clearly stated that the State had no serious objection to granting anticipatory bail. However, it was emphasized that the petitioner must cooperate with the investigation, especially in aiding the recovery of the kada (metal bangle) allegedly involved in the case.

"The State has no serious objection to grant of anticipatory bail provided the accused/applicant joins investigation and helps in recovery of kada," stated the Additional Public Prosecutor.

After hearing both sides and considering that the co-accused were already out on bail, and the State did not oppose the bail strongly, the High Court granted anticipatory bail to Pawan Kumar Singh. The bail is subject to the accused furnishing a personal bond of ₹10,000 with one surety of the same amount.

Read also:- Kerala HC: No Legal Protection for Cheque Bounce Cases Involving Cash Loans Above ₹20,000 Without Valid Proof

“In view of no objection from State, the application is allowed… Pending application stands disposed of,” held Justice Girish Kathpalia.

The court directed that the bail would be effective in the event of the applicant’s arrest, and required him to cooperate fully with the investigating authorities.

Case Title: Pawan Kumar Singh vs. State (NCT of Delhi)

Case Number: Bail Application No. 2738/2025 & CRL.M.A. 21355/2025

FIR No.: 491/2025, Police Station: S.P. Badli, Delhi